ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Advancing translational science through trial integrity: REDCap-based approaches to mitigating fraud and bias.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have the potential to increase pace and reach of recruitment as well as to improve sample representation, compared to traditional in-person clinical trials. However, concerns linger regarding data integrity in DCTs due to threats of fraud and sampling bias. The purpose of this report is to describe two tools that we have developed and successfully implemented to combat these threats. Cheatblocker and QuotaConfig are two external modules that we have made publicly available within the REDCap data capture system to target fraud and sampling bias, respectively. We describe the modules, present two case examples in which we used the modules successfully, and discuss the potential impact of tools such as these on data integrity in DCTs. We situate this discussion within the broader landscape of translational science wherein we strive to improve research rigor and efficiency to maximize public health benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.