ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Efforts to Enhance Recruitment and Engagement of Caregivers from Medically Underserved Communities in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Vaccine Promotion App.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over 15 million children in the United States have been infected with COVID-19; nearly 2,000 have died. Approval of COVID-19 vaccines for children enabled reductions in disease severity and mortality. Disparities in vaccine adoption exist along racial, ethnic, and rural-urban lines, with lower uptake among medically underserved populations (e.g. Black, non-Hispanic White rural populations) compared to urban White populations. This study examined efforts to recruit and engage a diverse cohort as part of a vaccine communication randomized trial conducted across 15 states and compared demographic characteristics of the enrolled cohort to the broader US population. To enhance recruitment of diverse populations, eligible clinics had to serve a significant proportion of medically underserved individuals based on race, ethnicity, or geographic location. Coordinators used both traditional (in-person daily clinic schedule review) and retrospective (EHR and billing data review) recruitment methods adapted to enrich engagement with focus populations. Demographic characteristics were compared to national statistics obtained from the CDC's Household Pulse Survey. In total, 2999 parents/caregivers were screened; 725 were randomized (24.1%). Comparing enrolled subjects to the demographics of participating states, 17.3% vs 9.8% self-identified as Hispanic, 39.6% vs 13.0% as Black. Additionally, 34.3% self-described as living in a rural area. Of the 725 randomized, 512 (70.6%) completed the baseline survey. Of these 512, 422 (82.4%) also completed the final survey of the 24-week study. This analysis demonstrates the Institutional Development Award States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network can successfully recruit and engage populations from diverse and underrepresented populations in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.