ReviewPain research & management2025
Mapping the Global Landscape of Temporomandibular Disorders Research in Children and Adolescents From 2000 to 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Pain research & management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the Global Landscape of Temporomandibular Disorders Research in Children and Adolescents From 2000 to 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis.Pain research & management · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to detect influential works and authors, collaboration patterns, the developmental trajectory, current hotspots, and research gaps by multiple-perspective bibliometric analyses on publications related to temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents from 2000 to 2024. Methods: All documents were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Excel, VOSviewer, Pajek, SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace software were utilized for visualized analyses of research trends, co-authorship (including authors, institutions, and countries), journals, keywords, and cited references. Results: A total of 2208 articles and reviews were retrieved and extracted. Both annual publications and citations exhibited the trend of significant increases. Pedersen TK was the most productive author, while List T was the most cited. The co-author networks represented by Yang C exhibited independent activities and emerging trends. Aarhus University was the most productive institution. Malmo University was influential with the most citations. The United States of America was leading and majorly collaborative in this field. Most Asian countries demonstrated a lack of cooperation but growingly engaged. Conclusions: Burst keywords and references showed that prevalences, the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint involvement in JIA, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and psychosocial factors were hotspots in recent years. It is hoped that this study will favor both clinicians and researchers by recommending valuable works, guiding their future work priorities, and inspiring their potential collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.