ArticleBMJ public health2025
Behavioural economics intervention to implement a nutrition ranking system in food pantries: Be Well cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06298253 (Behavioral Economics to Implement a Traffic Light Nutrition Ranking System in a Network of Food Pantries), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Behavioral Economics to Implement a Traffic Light Nutrition Ranking System in a Network of Food Pantries: Study 2
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Food pantries are critical for addressing food insecurity, but dietary quality of food offered by pantries and selected by clients is often low. Supporting Wellness at Pantries (SWAP) is an evidence-based nutrition labelling strategy (eg, green=choose often; red=choose rarely) that has not been adopted widely due to implementation barriers. Behavioural economics (BE) strategies could help overcome these barriers. Methods and analysis: The Be Well Study is testing a multicomponent BE intervention to increase implementation of SWAP in a 12-month cluster randomised controlled trial, followed by 12-month extended follow-up, in 30 pantries affiliated with a large food bank in eastern Massachusetts. During study months 1-12, intervention pantries receive the BE-enhanced SWAP implementation strategy including: SWAP toolkits, SWAP invoice labelling, dietitian-led learning communities, implementation incentives and the opportunity to earn a seal of approval. Control pantries receive basic SWAP information and invoice labelling. During extended follow-up (months 13-24), control pantries receive the BE intervention. Outcomes are assessed at the pantry (n=30) and client (n=3750) levels using pantry audits, food bank ordering data, client surveys and client basket audits and include changes from baseline to 6 and 12 (primary) months in: SWAP implementation, percent green-labelled foods ordered by pantries and selected by clients, and client dietary quality. During extended follow-up, these outcomes are assessed at 18 and 24 months. Be Well is testing strategies to overcome implementation barriers for healthy eating interventions in the charitable food system. Findings will inform future interventions to support pantry clients' selection and consumption of healthier food. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board of Mass General Brigham (Protocols 2024P000832). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and summaries shared with national and local stakeholders in the charitable food system. Trial registration number: NCT06298253.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.