ReviewHaematologica2026
Gynecologic and obstetric management of girls and women with von Willebrand disease.
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Von Willebrand disease: A century of progress.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Introduction to the Review Series. A century after Erik von Willebrand.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Beyond a century of discovery: the global and persistent burden of underdiagnosis in von Willebrand disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the first patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) described by Eric von Willebrand almost a century ago were young girls and women from a family in the Åland Islands who experienced "genital hemorrhage" so excessive that it led to exsanguination in five members.1 Only recently has attention focused on the risks and challenges that females with VWD face when experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding, conception, pregnancy, and delivery. The persistent monthly losses with heavy menstrual bleeding and increased demands during pregnancy commonly result in iron deficiency, but the lack of consensus regarding screening and treatment leads to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. While the genetics of VWD are known, female members of affected kindreds are infrequently screened and not considered at risk. Among girls and women with VWD in whom reproductive tract bleeding is the most common symptom, a diagnosis of VWD is often delayed up to a decade or more, leading to significant morbidity, fatigue, depression, iron deficiency, and poor quality of life. Furthermore, there is low certainty regarding effectiveness of current therapies and a lack of prospective trials to guide treatment. Novel therapeutics for inherited bleeding disorders are on the horizon, but women are excluded from studies and have poor access to care. While collaborative hematology-gynecology clinics have improved outcomes, females continue to be excluded from decision-making about their own care. Now, 100 years after the first cases of VWD were reported, it is timely to advocate for better care and management of females with reproductive tract bleeding to assure their future well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.