ReviewHaematologica2026
Molecular genetic testing in von Willebrand disease: past, present, and beyond.
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Past, Present, and Future of von Willebrand Disease.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Population Frequencies of VWD-Associated Genotypes: Cross-Resource Evidence from RGC-ME and gnomAD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Expression of wild-type and recombinant D4-CK domains of VWF gene with novel variants in Pakistan.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Introduction to the Review Series. A century after Erik von Willebrand.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gene for von Willebrand factor (VWF) was among the earliest genomic discoveries in the mid-1980s. It became feasible to use this new knowledge to better understand the genetic mechanisms responsible for von Willebrand disease (VWD) and to utilize the information to generate molecular genetic diagnostic testing strategies. Following initial studies demonstrating large structural variants in type 3 VWD patients, investigations focused on the genetic basis of the various type 2 forms of VWD, demonstrating that the pathogenic variants were localized to regions of the gene encoding functionally distinct domains of the VWF glycoprotein. These observations have resulted in increasing use of molecular genetic diagnosis as either the primary strategy for diagnosing type 2 forms of VWD or, more often, as confirmatory tests to substantiate the results of prior phenotypic analysis. In the meantime, genetic studies of type 3 were demonstrating that a wide range of pathogenic variants located throughout the VWF coding sequence were responsible for this severe phenotype. These studies also showed that ~15% of pathogenic variants responsible for type 3 were missense substitutions and that in ~25% of families this severe phenotype, classically thought to be recessive in nature, was transmitted as a semi-dominant trait. Finally, the most prevalent form of VWD, type 1/Low VWF, has proven to be the most challenging for routine molecular genetic testing, with VWF coding sequence variants identified in only ~65% of index cases. This review explores various aspects of molecular genetic testing for VWF, commemorating the 100th anniversary of VWD and the 40th anniversary of VWF cloning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.