ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between social camouflaging and pragmatic competence in adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD), with a particular focus on gender. It is based on the hypothesis that camouflaging contributes to under or misdiagnosis, especially in women and gender-diverse individuals. A total of 225 adults participated in a cross-sectional online survey, completing the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q) and the Pragmatic Awareness Questionnaire (PAQ). Participants were grouped based on clinical diagnosis (ASD or BPD) and self-identified gender (women, men and gender-diverse). Among women, no significant differences in camouflaging scores were found between the ASD and BPD groups, suggesting the use of similar adaptation strategies that may obscure clinical differentiation. In contrast, among men, camouflaging and pragmatic deficits were more distinctly associated with autistic traits. No substantial differences were observed among gender-diverse participants, highlighting the influence of contextual and identity-related factors. Findings emphasize the importance of integrating detailed pragmatic assessments and adopting gender-sensitive approaches in the differential diagnosis of ASD and BPD. Such strategies may help reduce misdiagnosis and improve recognition of autistic traits, particularly in populations that tend to camouflage more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.