Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496656›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Adapting Psychological Therapies for Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Andrew C Poku, Kylie M Gray, Olivia Hewitt, Peter E Langdon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew C PokuCentre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7595-0147
Kylie M GrayIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute (IDRIS), The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Olivia HewittIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute (IDRIS), The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter E LangdonIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute (IDRIS), The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-1825

Funding

Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS TrustUniversity of Warwick Collaborative Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to identify how psychotherapies have been adapted to suit the needs of people with intellectual disabilities. A comprehensive literature search garnered 39,777 studies, which were screened for eligibility. Systematic searches, following PRISMA guidelines, identified 122 studies that met eligibility criteria, and findings were synthesised using framework synthesis. Six overarching adaptation categories were identified: (1) multisensory methods, (2) activities, (3) communication, (4) delivery medium, (5) additional support and (6) structure. Adaptations were primarily used to increase engagement, promote retention of information and improve communication between clients and clinicians. While a group of adaptations that aimed to improve the acceptability and accessibility of psychotherapy for people with intellectual disabilities were identified, larger studies are required to understand their efficacy.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPsychotherapyHumansadaptationintellectual disabilitiesmental healthmodificationpsychological therapypsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41496656
PMCPMC12775901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.