ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Patients' Perceptions of Physicians' Health Literacy Competencies and "Good" Communication in Family Medicine: A Q Methodology Study.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence to support treatment decision making in renal cancer: findings from the KATY project.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health literacy competencies enable physicians to communicate effectively, fostering patients' understanding, trust, and shared decision-making. However, research has largely emphasized physicians' views rather than patients'. This study examined how patients perceive physicians' health literacy competencies and how these perceptions shape their views of "good communication" in family medicine. Forty-four Q-statements were developed based on established indicators of physician health literacy and professional competencies. A total of 62 patients were randomly invited from family medicine outpatient clinics at 2 medical centers in northern Taiwan, with 42 completing the Q-sorting task. Data were analyzed using Q-factor analysis, combining quantitative statistical methods with qualitative interview data to identify distinct groups of patient perspectives. The Q-factor analysis identified 5 distinct patient perspectives, accounting for 50.88% of the total variance. These perspectives were categorized as: (1) Paternalistic Model - Physician-Dependent, characterized by patient reliance on physician authority; (2) Interpretive Model - Self-Empowered, emphasizing patient autonomy and active participation; (3) Interpretive Model - Shared Decision-Making, reflecting a balance of physician expertise and patient autonomy; (4) Informative Model - Patient-Centered, prioritizing clear communication and patient rights; and (5) Deliberative Model - Physician-Respecting, balancing professional competence with empathetic patient engagement. Patients perceive "good communication" in various ways influenced by health literacy, cultural values, and expectations of the physician's role. The findings emphasize the need for communication training that adjusts to patients' different health literacy levels and preferences, incorporating these perspectives into physician education and practice to encourage patient-centered, health literacy-oriented care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.