Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496547›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025

Understanding self-inflicted penile strangulation: a case series analysis of clinical management and psychological considerations.

Siddharta Saxena, Vikas Kumar Panwar, Ankur Mittal, Mohammed Taher Mujahid, Mehul Agarwal, Nalin Kumar Srivastav

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siddharta SaxenaDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.
Vikas Kumar PanwarDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6441-6775
Ankur MittalDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.
Mohammed Taher MujahidDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.
Mehul AgarwalDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.
Nalin Kumar SrivastavDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249201, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjuries to the penis resulting from self-inflicted strangulation with various objects are uncommon, yet these injuries are more frequently observed in young adults. Medical literature has identified items such as hair, thread, rubber bands, metallic rings, and vacuum erection devices as tools used for this purpose. These constrictive items impede venous return from the penis, potentially leading to severe complications such as ischemia or necrosis. This case series aims to analyse the clinical presentation, management strategies, and psychological dimensions of self-inflicted penile strangulation through a case series. CASE PRESENTATION: We conducted a retrospective analysis of three cases of penile strangulation treated at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh between 2022 and 2023. Cases were classified using a modified Bhat et al. grading system. Management techniques, complications, and psychological assessments were documented with a follow-up of 2 years. Individual consent was obtained from the patients for this case series. This article has been prepared according to the PROCESS guidelines. The cases represented a spectrum of clinical severity (Grades I-IV) with diverse constricting devices (metallic ring, plumbing fixtures, hair fibres) and presentation times (6 h to several days). Device-specific removal techniques were employed with successful outcomes. Psychiatric evaluation revealed distinct patterns: sexual experimentation in younger patients (35 and 32 years old) and major depressive disorder with paraphilic tendencies resulting in chronic self-harm (53-year-old), which eventually required partial penectomy.

conclusionThis study underscores the critical need for healthcare providers to recognize and understand the complexities surrounding self-inflicted penile strangulation injuries. By increasing awareness, providers can better address the psychological dimensions and surgical management strategies associated with these cases. Furthermore, involving the family in the patient's care is essential; counselling and education can play a pivotal role in preventing future recurrences of major depressive disorder.

Indexed as

PenisSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiescase reportparaphiliapenile amputationpenile ringspenile strangulationself-inflicted penile injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.