ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025
Understanding self-inflicted penile strangulation: a case series analysis of clinical management and psychological considerations.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Penile Strangulation in a 68 Years Old Male by Plastic Bottleneck: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjuries to the penis resulting from self-inflicted strangulation with various objects are uncommon, yet these injuries are more frequently observed in young adults. Medical literature has identified items such as hair, thread, rubber bands, metallic rings, and vacuum erection devices as tools used for this purpose. These constrictive items impede venous return from the penis, potentially leading to severe complications such as ischemia or necrosis. This case series aims to analyse the clinical presentation, management strategies, and psychological dimensions of self-inflicted penile strangulation through a case series. CASE PRESENTATION: We conducted a retrospective analysis of three cases of penile strangulation treated at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh between 2022 and 2023. Cases were classified using a modified Bhat et al. grading system. Management techniques, complications, and psychological assessments were documented with a follow-up of 2 years. Individual consent was obtained from the patients for this case series. This article has been prepared according to the PROCESS guidelines. The cases represented a spectrum of clinical severity (Grades I-IV) with diverse constricting devices (metallic ring, plumbing fixtures, hair fibres) and presentation times (6 h to several days). Device-specific removal techniques were employed with successful outcomes. Psychiatric evaluation revealed distinct patterns: sexual experimentation in younger patients (35 and 32 years old) and major depressive disorder with paraphilic tendencies resulting in chronic self-harm (53-year-old), which eventually required partial penectomy.
conclusionThis study underscores the critical need for healthcare providers to recognize and understand the complexities surrounding self-inflicted penile strangulation injuries. By increasing awareness, providers can better address the psychological dimensions and surgical management strategies associated with these cases. Furthermore, involving the family in the patient's care is essential; counselling and education can play a pivotal role in preventing future recurrences of major depressive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41496547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.