ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025
Stenting severely obstructed ureters: a useful method for a common challenge.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper we describe a surgical technique for achieving safe ureteral stent placement in cases of severe obstruction. Although retrograde endoscopic stenting is often the preferred method for ureteral drainage, the existing literature offers limited insight into innovative surgical methods made possible by recent technological advancements. In this report, we present a method that employs a ureteral dilator as an anchor to facilitate precise and effective stent insertion. The technique involves positioning a ureteral dilator in close contact with the tip of the obstructing stone. In this position, the dilator not only functions to dilate the ureter but also serves as a stable anchor point, facilitating the passage of the ureteral stent. We successfully employed this method in 23 patients in whom initial attempts at safe stent placement were unsuccessful due to severe obstruction. In all cases, ureteral drainage was achieved, thus avoiding percutaneous nephrostomy. Our findings suggest that the tensile strength of the ureteral dilator provides reliable anchorage, supporting the advancement of the stent. This technique may offer a safe and effective alternative for ureteral stenting in cases of severe obstruction, potentially reducing the need for percutaneous nephrostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41496543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.