Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496543›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025

Stenting severely obstructed ureters: a useful method for a common challenge.

Yoav Avidor, Ghalib Lidawi, Muhammad Majdoub, Mohsin Asali, Ronen Rub

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoav Avidor *Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, 3810000, Israel.
Ghalib Lidawi *Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, 3810000, Israel.
Muhammad MajdoubDepartment of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, 3810000, Israel.
Mohsin AsaliDepartment of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, 3810000, Israel.
Ronen RubDepartment of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, 3810000, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we describe a surgical technique for achieving safe ureteral stent placement in cases of severe obstruction. Although retrograde endoscopic stenting is often the preferred method for ureteral drainage, the existing literature offers limited insight into innovative surgical methods made possible by recent technological advancements. In this report, we present a method that employs a ureteral dilator as an anchor to facilitate precise and effective stent insertion. The technique involves positioning a ureteral dilator in close contact with the tip of the obstructing stone. In this position, the dilator not only functions to dilate the ureter but also serves as a stable anchor point, facilitating the passage of the ureteral stent. We successfully employed this method in 23 patients in whom initial attempts at safe stent placement were unsuccessful due to severe obstruction. In all cases, ureteral drainage was achieved, thus avoiding percutaneous nephrostomy. Our findings suggest that the tensile strength of the ureteral dilator provides reliable anchorage, supporting the advancement of the stent. This technique may offer a safe and effective alternative for ureteral stenting in cases of severe obstruction, potentially reducing the need for percutaneous nephrostomy.

Indexed as

Prosthesis ImplantationStentsUreteral ObstructionUreteroscopyDilatationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexUreterUreteral Calculidouble-J stentseverely-obstructed ureterureteral calculiureteral dilatorureteroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.