ArticleBalkan medical journal2026
Comparison of Tocolytic Agents for Successful External Cephalic Version: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Sixteen Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Balkan medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section is frequently performed for breech presentation; however, external cephalic version (ECV) is recommended as an alternative strategy to increase the likelihood of vaginal birth. Tocolytic agents are commonly administrated to improve ECV success, yet the comparative effectiveness of different regimens remains inadequately characterized. Aims: To systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of various tocolytic agents in facilitating successful ECV through a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Study Design: Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods: Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the "gemtc" package in R 4.1.1. Treatment effects were quantified by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve values were used to rank tocolytic agents according to ECV success rates, maternal outcomes, and adverse events. Results: A total of sixteen RCTs encompassing 2,817 participants and six distinct tocolytic agents met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, terbutaline (OR: 2.7, 95% CrI: 1.1-6.4) and ritodrine (OR: 2.2, 95% CrI: 1.4-3.9) were associated with significantly higher ECV success rates. Additionally, terbutaline was linked to an increased likelihood of vaginal delivery (OR: 2.0, 95% CrI: 1.0-2.9). Maternal adverse effects, including tachycardia, palpitations, hypotension, nausea, dizziness, and flushing, were more frequently reported with terbutaline, nifedipine, and nitroglycerin than with placebo. No statistically significant differences in fetal heart rate abnormalities were detected among the elevated interventions. Conclusion: Terbutaline and ritodrine appear to offer superior efficacy in improving ECV success compared with alternative tocolytic agents, albeit with a higher incidence of maternal side effects. Consequently, clinical decision-making regarding tocolytic use should be informed by a comprehensive assessment of the associated benefits and potential risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.