ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Mechanism of ultrasonic treatment affecting the conformation and properties of oat-whey dual-protein gel.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant and animal proteins can provide beneficial synergistic effects in compensating for their structural and nutritional inadequacies. In this study, oat protein (OP) was combined with whey protein (WP) and were subjected to ultrasonic treatment to produce a dual-protein gel. This investigation systematically analysed the changes in protein aggregation state, conformation, and properties of OP-WP gels with varying protein ratios (OP, 7:3, 5:5, 3:7 and WP) and ultrasonic power treatments (power 0, 200, 400 and 600 W), and explored the underlying formation mechanism. It was revealed that both increased whey protein content and moderate ultrasonic power significantly reduced the particle size of protein aggregates. Meanwhile, this increased the conversion rate from α-helix to β-sheet and reduced the amount of random coil structures, and decreased the content of free sulfhydryl groups. At 400 W ultrasonic power, the dual-protein gel with an OP:WP ratio of 3:7 exhibited excellent textural properties, rheological behavior, gel strength (147.96 gf) and water-holding capacity (50.96 %). Disulfides and hydrophobic interactions were enhanced by a tight and uniform gel framework. Furthermore, excessive sonication (600 W) disrupted protein conformation by increasing α-helix to 12.90 % and random coiling to 12.99 %, causing a decline in fluorescence intensity and weakening of structural stability of OP-WP gel. This research offers new insights and technical references for the adoption of ultrasonic processing in dual-protein gel systems and the exploitation of novel high-protein food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.