ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
The impact of positive and negative affect on aperiodic EEG activity: evidence for a shared neural basis of metacontrol and emotion.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metacontrol refers to the ability to dynamically adjust cognitive-control strategies, ensuring a balance between persistence and flexibility. Empirical findings point to a strong link between metacontrol and emotion, but the mechanistic underpinnings of this link remain unknown. Here, we had two goals. First, we hypothesized that metacontrol and emotion are mechanistically linked through aperiodic EEG activity, in the sense that both positive emotion and metacontrol flexibility come with increases, and both negative emotion and metacontrol persistence with decreases of aperiodic activity. Second, we tested whether and to what degree emotional stimuli affect behavior and aperiodic activity automatically. In a large sample (n = 120), we examined EEG and behavioral data from three tasks in which we systematically varied the task-relevance of the emotional information presented to participants. As hypothesized, positive pictures resulted in higher aperiodic activity than negative pictures. Task context and, more specifically, the relevance of emotional stimuli significantly influenced overt behavior but had no effect on aperiodic activity. We conclude that positive and negative emotions may represent the phenomenal "feel" of metacontrol biases towards flexibility and persistence, respectively, and that the degree to which processes are affected by emotional content automatically depends on the process under consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.