ArticleNorth Carolina medical journal2023
Evaluating a Health Care Pathway Internship Program for Minority High School Students.
Article in North Carolina medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2005, Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC) collaborated with community partners to establish the Minority Medical Mentoring Program (MMMP), a semester-long health care pathway internship for high school seniors of color. This evaluation aimed to assess program participants' perceptions of program components, identify areas for improvement, and broaden the evidence base of pathway programs.
methodsSeventy-three MMMP alumni were invited to participate in an online survey. Closed- and open-ended questions aimed to assess respondents' perceptions of program components and MMMP's impact on their personal and professional lives.
resultsForty-six alumni responded to the survey. The MMMP was perceived as universally valuable. Clinical shadowing, mentors of color, and exposure to a variety of health professionals were viewed as the most valuable program components. The MMMP strengthened participants' awareness of health disciplines, improved their self-confidence, and increased their professional skill sets. Surprisingly, the MMMP enabled some participants to recognize health career interests outside of clinical care. LIMITATIONS: Selection, social desirability, and recall bias may limit interpretation of findings.
conclusionsThe MMMP is highly valued by participants. A high majority of respondents (40/46; 87%) plan to have a health career in the future. Pathway programs can shape career paths, increase self-awareness, and build self-confidence for success. It is important to note that systemic racism and discrimination must be addressed to fully ensure recruitment and retention of health care providers of color.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.