ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
FEC Check: Development of a decision support tool to aid interpretation of gastrointestinal nematode faecal egg counts in sheep.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal nematode infections are ubiquitous in grazing livestock worldwide impacting animal health and production. Faecal egg count (FEC) is an accessible diagnostic test that can guide the need for treatment. However, interpretation of FECs can be challenging.
methodsA prototype decision support tool (DST) was developed using a 'traffic light'-style gradient of potential clinical impact on sheep FEC results. Focus groups were conducted with farmers, livestock advisors and veterinary clinicians to examine the barriers to FEC uptake and provide feedback on the prototype tool.
resultsBarriers to uptake for FEC testing included timeliness of reporting, lack of perceived need and knowledge gaps. The DST was well received at all focus groups, with simplicity and ease of use identified as key principles to drive uptake. At the 12 months post-launch, the DST had 1916 users. LIMITATIONS: Engagement with stakeholders with less familiarity with FECs may improve usability for a wider audience.
conclusionThe final DST developed here represents a practical resource to improve the interpretation of FEC results reported by farmers and other stakeholders. The initial uptake observed within the first year since launch is promising for the wider adoption of evidence-based parasite management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.