Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495913›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of dermatology2026

Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Biologic Therapies in Prurigo Nodularis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Andrea Lancz, Fanni Adél Meznerics, Renáta Árok, Anna Sára Lengyel, Bence Szabó, Péter Hegyi, Norbert Kiss, András Bánvölgyi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea LanczDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9910-9757
Fanni Adél MeznericsDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-6838
Renáta ÁrokDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1458-7697
Anna Sára LengyelDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence SzabóCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6354-3545
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-7259
Norbert KissDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-1755
András BánvölgyiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-1364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic, intensely pruritic skin disorder characterized by hyperkeratotic nodules and a debilitating itch-scratch cycle. Conventional therapies have limited efficacy and safety issues, while biologics have recently emerged as a promising alternative. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was conducted on November 20, 2023, to identify studies assessing treatments for PN. Primary outcomes were changes in pruritus and quality of life. Safety was evaluated by adverse event incidence. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when sufficient data were available. Of 4914 records screened, 128 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 were included in the meta-analysis. In studies of dupilumab, treatment was associated with marked reductions in pruritus (mean difference [MD], -5.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.86 to -4.67) and significant improvement in quality of life (MD, -11.84; 95% CI, -22.76 to -0.92), with adverse events reported in 13% of patients (95% CI, 0.02-0.52). Phototherapy achieved complete responses in 23% (95% CI, 9%-48%), partial responses in 60% (95% CI, 39%-78%), and no response in 7% (95% CI, 1%-40%). Thalidomide was associated with complete, partial, and no response rates of 15% (95% CI, 1%-71%), 49% (95% CI, 23%-75%), and 12% (95% CI, 6%-23%), respectively. Dupilumab offers consistent, clinically meaningful improvements in PN with a favorable safety profile, supporting its use as the preferred first-line treatment. Phototherapy and thalidomide remain alternatives for selected patients but achieve complete clearance in few cases and carry greater safety concerns.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDermatologic AgentsPrurigoHumansPhototherapyPruritusQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDermatologic Agentsdupilumabdupilumabphototherapyprurigo nodularisthalidomide

Identifiers

PMID41495913
PMCPMC12979244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.