Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495893›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Protein structure-informed bacteriophage genome annotation with Phold.

George Bouras, Susanna R Grigson, Milot Mirdita, Michael Heinzinger, Bhavya Papudeshi, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, Renee Green, Rachel Seongeun Kim, Victor Mihalia, Alkis James Psaltis and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  15. Persistent trade-offs balance competition and colonization across centuries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

George BourasAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-4186
Susanna R GrigsonCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-3451
Milot MirditaSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Michael HeinzingerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center, Munich, 85764, Germany.
Bhavya PapudeshiCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-3100
Vijini MallawaarachchiCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.
Renee GreenCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.
Rachel Seongeun KimSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Victor MihaliaSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Alkis James PsaltisAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Peter-John WormaldAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Sarah VreugdeAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Martin SteineggerSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-9753
Robert A EdwardsCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-8949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophage (phage) genome annotation is essential for understanding their functional potential and suitability for use as therapeutic agents. Here, we introduce Phold, an annotation framework utilizing protein structural information that combines the ProstT5 protein language model and structural alignment tool Foldseek. Phold assigns annotations using a database of over 1.36 million predicted phage protein structures with high-quality functional labels. Benchmarking reveals that Phold outperforms existing sequence-based homology approaches in functional annotation sensitivity whilst maintaining speed, consistency, and scalability. Applying Phold to diverse cultured and metagenomic phage genomes shows it consistently annotates over 50% of genes on an average phage and 40% on an average archaeal virus. Comparisons of phage protein structures to other protein structures across the tree of life reveal that phage proteins commonly have structural homology to proteins shared across the tree of life, particularly those that have nucleic acid metabolism and enzymatic functions. Phold is available as free and open-source software at https://github.com/gbouras13/phold.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesGenome, ViralMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41495893
PMCPMC12774648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.