ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
The Role of Gaze in Shaping Forms of Reflective Practice: A Legitimation Code Theory Analysis of Clinical Supervision in Danish Primary Care.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Gaze in Shaping Forms of Reflective Practice: A Legitimation Code Theory Analysis of Clinical Supervision in Danish Primary Care.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate how supervision models may cultivate or constrain different ways of knowing and learning in primary care. METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN AND JUSTIFICATION: The research employed a qualitative methodological design, grounded in Legitimation Code Theory, to gain an in-depth understanding of the dynamics at play within various supervision models. It aligns with the QRSR guidelines. ETHICAL ISSUES AND APPROVAL: Ethical considerations were thoroughly addressed, and approval was obtained prior to initiating the study, ensuring participant confidentiality and informed consent. RESEARCH METHODS, INSTRUMENTS, AND
interventionsThe study utilised qualitative interviews as the primary research method, conducting 18 interviews with a diverse range of healthcare professionals, including leaders, nurses, nursing assistants, physiotherapists, and both internal and external supervision consultants. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analysis focused on identifying how different supervision models influenced reflective practice and shaped the participants' perceptions regarding the effectiveness and utility of these models.
resultsFindings illustrated the complex interplay of cultivated, social, and trained gazes within healthcare settings, highlighting how different forms of legitimation shape what counts as meaningful understanding and reflective practice. STUDY LIMITATIONS: While the study provides valuable insights, it is important to acknowledge limitations related to the heterogeneous nature of the material across the interventions.
conclusionsThe concept of gaze not only elucidates the presuppositions underlying different supervision models but also elucidates how the usefulness of different supervision models is legitimated within practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.