ArticleBMC psychology2026
Development and validation of the Student Social Resilience Scale for Disasters (SSRD) among adolescents in disaster-prone areas.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop and validate the Student Social Resilience Scale for Disasters (SSRD) as a reliable instrument for measuring the social resilience of high school students in disaster-prone areas. Despite the growing global focus on the issue of resilience, there remains a paucity of instruments that are specifically capable of capturing the multidimensional nature of adolescent social resilience in the context of education, particularly in disaster-affected areas. The present study involved 800 students from high schools in Indonesia and employed Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to assess the psychometric quality of the SSRD. The EFA results identified three main dimensions, namely Individual, Relationship, and Contextual, while CFA confirmed the construct validity with excellent model fit indices (CFI = 0.968; TLI = 0.965; RMSEA = 0.055). Reliability analysis demonstrated high internal consistency across all dimensions (Cronbach's Alpha 0.925). Moreover, the second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the existence of a second-order construct in the individual factor. This construct was found to consist of self-efficacy and emotional regulation, problem-solving and adaptability, and motivation and perseverance. These findings confirm that SSRD is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring students' social resilience in disaster-prone contexts. In addition to its contribution to the development of theory through the integration of personal, relational, and contextual dimensions, this instrument also has practical implications for education policymakers and practitioners in the design of more targeted disaster education interventions and psychosocial support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.