Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495828›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2026

Comparison of verbal autopsy using a large language model to biologically confirmed causes of death for malaria and other communicable diseases among children in six sub-Saharan African countries.

Ronald Carshon-Marsh, Richard Wen, Thomas Kai Sze Ng, Rajeev Kamadod, Isaac Bogoch, Susan J Bondy, Theodore J Witek, Prabhat Jha

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ronald Carshon-MarshDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. ronald.carshonmarsh@mail.utoronto.ca.
Richard WenCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Thomas Kai Sze NgCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Rajeev KamadodCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Isaac BogochDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H2, Canada.
Susan J BondyDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
Theodore J WitekDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
Prabhat JhaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria, a preventable parasitic disease, causes most child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Reliable cause-of-death data are essential to evaluate progress toward the national and global malaria control goals. However, civil registration and vital statistics are often weak and incomplete in many low- and middle-income countries. In such circumstances, verbal autopsy (VA) provides an alternative means of mortality surveillance. In some settings, VA has been paired with Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) to obtain detailed biological confirmation of the causes of death. Here, we compare malaria-attributed and all-cause mortality among children younger than five years in six SSA countries, using three computer models (GPT-4o, InSilicoVA, and InterVA-5) to assign causes of death, against MITS as the reference standard.

methodWe examined 3129 under-five deaths enrolled in six Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) country sites in SSA between December 2016 and December 2022. Contrived free-text narrative summaries were generated for each record and coded into International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes by GPT-4o. InSilicoVA and InterVA-5 outputs, provided in the World Health Organization 2016 VA codes, were harmonized to ICD-10 for comparison. The primary comparison was the underlying cause of death in VA models and MITS.

resultsSierra Leone had the highest proportion of post-neonatal deaths attributed to malaria at 30.3% (67/221), followed by Kenya at 17.3% (42/243), then Mozambique at 13% (18/138) and Mali at 5.5% (3/55) as defined by MITS. No malaria-attributable deaths were observed in neonates and stillbirths. GPT-4o correctly classified 60 (46.2%) of 130 malaria deaths, compared with 39 (30.0%) for InSilicoVA and 30 (23.1%) for InterVA-5. At the population level, the GPT-4o model achieved a higher cause-specific mortality fraction accuracy (0.36) compared to InSilicoVA (0.07) and InterVA-5 (0.08). GPT-4o performed comparatively better in attributing malaria, HIV/AIDS, and diarrhoeal diseases compared to other communicable diseases.

conclusionGPT-4o demonstrated superior performance over probabilistic VA models in identifying malaria-attributed deaths. National vital registration authorities and health ministries should consider integrating large language model-driven tools into their VA systems to enhance diagnostic precision. While less practicable at scale, focal and periodic MITS comparisons are useful for improving verbal autopsy systems. National mortality data are essential to track progress in reducing childhood deaths from malaria and other conditions.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesMalariaAfrica South of the SaharaAutopsyCause of DeathChild MortalityChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLarge Language ModelsMaleCause of deathGPT-4oInSilicoVAInterVA-5Large language modelMalariaMinimally invasive tissue samplingSub‐Saharan AfricaVerbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID41495828
PMCPMC12870146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.