ArticleGenome medicine2026
Detection of primary cancer types via fragment size selection in circulating cell-free extrachromosomal circular DNA.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics profiling of recurrence-associated extrachromosomal circular DNA characteristics and its prognostic potential in lung adenocarcinoma.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Detection of primary cancer types via fragment size selection in circulating cell-free extrachromosomal circular DNA.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtrachromosomal circular DNA has emerged as a pivotal factor in tumor biology, contributing to intratumor heterogeneity, oncogene amplification, and tumor evolution. Despite its relevance, the presence and molecular characteristics of plasma-derived cell-free extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) in cancer patients remain insufficiently explored.
methodsIn this study, we profiled plasma-derived cell-free eccDNA from a multi-cancer cohort consisting of 413 cancer patients and 239 healthy individuals. We analyzed eccDNA fragment size distributions using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model and identified fragment size features to distinguish tumor-derived eccDNA from non-tumor-derived eccDNA. We further performed in silico fragment size selection and developed a gene-based annotation method to characterize the gene content carried by cell-free eccDNA across different cancer types. By utilizing these cell-free eccDNA signatures, we developed ScanTecc (screening cancer types with cell-free eccDNA), a machine learning-based approach for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin classification. The classification performance of ScanTecc was further evaluated at the individual sample level using multiple machine learning classifiers, including adaptive boosting and logistic regression.
resultsWe observed a significantly higher abundance and longer fragment lengths of eccDNA in cancer patients’ plasma. Analysis of the PDX mouse model revealed a distinct fragment size threshold of approximately 1,000 base pairs that effectively differentiates tumor-derived eccDNA from non-tumor-derived counterparts. Following fragment size selection, gene-based annotation of large-sized eccDNA revealed cancer type–specific enrichment of tumor-associated genes. Leveraging these features, ScanTecc achieved an overall AUC of 0.92 for distinguishing cancer patients from healthy individuals, with consistently high performance across disease stages, including stage I (AUC = 0.92) and stage IV (AUC = 0.93). ScanTecc also enabled accurate tissue-of-origin classification and achieved an overall AUC of 0.79 in identifying specific cancer types, with AUC values ranging from 0.70 for gastric cancer to 0.81 for ovarian cancer.
conclusionsOur study establishes a multi-cancer plasma cell-free eccDNA landscape and introduces a non-invasive cancer screening framework based on cell-free eccDNA features, highlighting the potential of plasma cell-free eccDNA for early cancer detection and tumor classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.