ArticleGenome biology2026
Predicting enviromically adapted varieties with big data.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robustly enhancing crop genomic prediction accuracy through ensemble learning and iterative optimization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- GE-BiFormer: bidirectional cross-attention integration of genomic and Enviromic data for genotype-by-environment prediction in maize.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Beyond Data: Artificial intelligence, knowledge graphs, and the next revolution in wheat breeding.Plant communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreeding programs prioritize the average performance of a genotype across environments and may overlook promising candidates for specific environments. To address this challenge, we propose a genomic prediction framework to select high-yielding genotypes tailored to individual environments.
resultsWe compiled winter wheat grain yield data from 13,285 genotypes-6,766 lines and 6,519 hybrids-evaluated in yield plots at 31 central european sites from 2010 to 2022. With integrated genomic data, we show that only as the size of the training dataset increase, convolutional neural networks benchmark competitive to superior compared with traditional genomic best linear unbiased predictions (GBLUP) in predicting average genotype performance of lines. We then extend our prediction models to account for genotype times environment (G × E) interactions by incorporating information about the growth environment. We observe a 23% improvement in predicting environment-specific performance of new hybrids within a network of test environments with GBLUP based models. To better understand the environmental variables driving G × E interactions, we conduct analyses on a core set of 500 genetically diverse lines. Using machine learning, we successfully identify pivotal environment variables driving the clustering of study environments in central europe and highlight the benefit of modelling G × E interactions in selection of enviromically adapted varieties.
conclusionsOur results suggest that big data in combination with machine learning and deep learning methods offers new ways to widen the genetic bottleneck often encountered when advancing candidates from early limited-environment to late stage multi-environment evaluations. This promises faster delivery of breeding progress to farmers' fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.