Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495804›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Predicting enviromically adapted varieties with big data.

Abhishek Gogna, Bahareh Kamali, Valentin Wimmer, Renate H Schmidt, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Wera Maria Eckhoff, Jochen C Reif, Yusheng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abhishek GognaLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Corrensstraße, Gatersleben, 306466, Germany.
Bahareh KamaliInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Katzenburgweg, 9a, Bonn, 53115, Germany.
Valentin WimmerKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Grimsehlstraße, 31, Einbeck, 37574, Germany.
Renate H SchmidtLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Corrensstraße, Gatersleben, 306466, Germany.
Ehsan Eyshi RezaeiLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Eberswalder, Straße 84, Müncheberg, 15374, Germany.
Wera Maria EckhoffKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Grimsehlstraße, 31, Einbeck, 37574, Germany.
Jochen C ReifLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Corrensstraße, Gatersleben, 306466, Germany. reif@ipk-gatersleben.de.
Yusheng ZhaoLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Corrensstraße, Gatersleben, 306466, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16DTM111BGerman Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture 28DK131A20A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreeding programs prioritize the average performance of a genotype across environments and may overlook promising candidates for specific environments. To address this challenge, we propose a genomic prediction framework to select high-yielding genotypes tailored to individual environments.

resultsWe compiled winter wheat grain yield data from 13,285 genotypes-6,766 lines and 6,519 hybrids-evaluated in yield plots at 31 central european sites from 2010 to 2022. With integrated genomic data, we show that only as the size of the training dataset increase, convolutional neural networks benchmark competitive to superior compared with traditional genomic best linear unbiased predictions (GBLUP) in predicting average genotype performance of lines. We then extend our prediction models to account for genotype times environment (G × E) interactions by incorporating information about the growth environment. We observe a 23% improvement in predicting environment-specific performance of new hybrids within a network of test environments with GBLUP based models. To better understand the environmental variables driving G × E interactions, we conduct analyses on a core set of 500 genetically diverse lines. Using machine learning, we successfully identify pivotal environment variables driving the clustering of study environments in central europe and highlight the benefit of modelling G × E interactions in selection of enviromically adapted varieties.

conclusionsOur results suggest that big data in combination with machine learning and deep learning methods offers new ways to widen the genetic bottleneck often encountered when advancing candidates from early limited-environment to late stage multi-environment evaluations. This promises faster delivery of breeding progress to farmers' fields.

Indexed as

Big DataPlant BreedingTriticumGene-Environment InteractionGenomicsGenotypeMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceBig dataBreeding programsDeep learningEnviromically adapted varietiesGenotype performanceGenotype times environment interactionsMachine learningWinter wheat

Identifiers

PMID41495804
PMCPMC12838137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.