ArticleVeterinary research2026
Comparative evaluation of histopathological lesions and viral antigen distribution in domestic pigs and wild boar inoculated intranasally with the highly virulent ASFV genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".
Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infection of the Conceptus With African Swine Fever Virus Following Artificial Insemination in Sows: A Pathological Study.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Dynamics of leukocyte populations, immune-regulatory cytokines, and biochemical parameters in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally infected with a virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating viral disease that affects domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). A previous study indicated that wild boar were more susceptible to ASF than pigs, with shorter incubation periods and earlier onset of the disease. This follow-up study aims to compare the pathogenesis and progression of the disease between the two subspecies during the early and late stages of infection following intranasal inoculation with the highly virulent genotype II strain 'Armenia 2007'. Histopathological changes and viral antigen distribution by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were assessed over time following intranasal inoculation. Viral antigen and histological changes were detected earlier in wild boar than in pigs. In wild boar, the medial retropharyngeal (MRPLN) and submandibular lymph nodes were among the earliest sites of virus replication from 3 days post-infection (dpi), with widespread dissemination occurring by 5 dpi. In pigs, the viral antigen was first detected in the MRPLN at 5 dpi. At the humane endpoint, which occurred at 6 dpi in wild boar and 9 dpi in pigs, virus antigen and histopathological scores were lower in wild boar than in pigs, even though the appearance and increase of viral antigen in tissues, onset and development of lesions and humane endpoint occurred earlier in the former. The lower severity and lesser extent of lesions in wild boar suggest lower tolerance of tissue damage prior to reaching the humane endpoint, demonstrating their greater susceptibility to and lower resistance against ASFV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.