ArticlePlant methods2026
Machine learning-based classification of roses using 18 SNP markers for optimized genebank management.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable classification of rose cultivars is complicated by their long and complex breeding history, frequent hybridization, and the coexistence of traditional horticultural categories with genetically heterogeneous groups. While molecular marker sets such as SSRs have been applied to assess genetic relationships, studies across cultivated roses and species are rare. Using 18 SNP markers on 1,345 accessions in combination with machine learning now offers an opportunity to systematically evaluate how well horticultural classes align with underlying genomic structure and to provide robust tools for the management of large germplasm collections.
resultsUsing a panel of SNP markers across 1,345 rose accessions from the Europa Rosarium Sangerhausen, multiple unsupervised (hierarchical, spectral, k-means, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN) and supervised (SVM, decision tree, naive Bayes, XGBoost) machine learning approaches were applied to identify genetic clusters and predict horticultural classifications. Across clustering methods, certain groups consistently emerged as genetically distinct, such as the alba and damask roses, which clustered together with low internal diversity, reflecting their shared historic origin. In contrast, tea, bengal, lutea, and remontant hybrids were repeatedly grouped together and predicted with high classification accuracies (up to 100%) but displayed high within-group diversity, which is consistent with complex breeding backgrounds. Miniature, kordesii, and rubiginosa hybrids also tended to cluster together, despite their differing horticultural labels. Overall, the labels obtained from unsupervised clustering were consistently confirmed by supervised models, which achieved balanced accuracies of up to 100%, highlighting the robustness of the observed groupings.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that machine learning applied to SNP marker data can robustly resolve genetic relationships among rose cultivars and provide novel insights into the alignment of horticultural classifications with genomic structure. The high predictive accuracies obtained suggest that marker-based classification can serve as a reliable complementary tool for genebank management, cultivar identification, and reassessment of traditional rose categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.