ArticleBMC public health2026
The impact of national context on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across Europe.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates vaccine hesitancy among the 50 + population in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the role of national contexts alongside individual determinants. The framework is guided by the WHO’s Complacency, Convenience, and Confidence (3Cs) model to explore factors influencing vaccination intent.
methodsData from over 45,000 SHARE Corona Survey respondents aged 50 + from 26 European countries were analysed regarding their intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Multilevel logistic regression models assessed associations with individual factors (socio-demographics, health, and economic conditions) and country-level indicators of complacency (mortality, containment policies), convenience (human development, health expenditure), and confidence (perceived vaccine safety and effectiveness, trust in authorities).
resultsKey findings suggest that higher COVID-19 mortality rates and stricter containment measures were tied to an increase in vaccine uptake by 2.8% points. Furthermore, trust in the vaccine itself, rather than in health authorities and governments, was associated with an increase in vaccination intent by 2.1% points.
conclusionsOur study reveals significant national disparities in vaccination attitudes and behaviours, linked to socio-economic factors and healthcare quality. The research highlights the interplay between individual and national factors, suggesting that successful vaccination campaigns require a holistic approach addressing both personal hesitations and systemic barriers. This research hence underscores the importance of public trust, robust healthcare systems, and targeted communication strategies to mitigate vaccine hesitancy and improve pandemic response outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.