ArticleBMC nursing2026
Moving on performance responsibility: an institutional ethnographic study of nurses' experiences with quality indicators in the transforming healthcare system of Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Job Demands, Stress Outcomes, and the Moderating Role of Resources Among Nursing Faculty in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore how nurses working in Saudi–affiliated health-care settings experience and negotiate quality indicators within the context of health system transformation in Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis qualitative institutional ethnographic study was conducted in tertiary teaching hospitals and primary health-care centres in Riyadh. Purposive sampling recruited 22 registered nurses from medical, surgical, critical care, emergency, oncology, obstetric, paediatric, and primary care units. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observations of quality-related activities, and collection of institutional texts, including policies, key performance indicator definitions, dashboards, and audit tools. Data were analysed using institutional ethnographic principles supported by NVivo 14 to map how nurses’ everyday work is coordinated by quality indicators and associated texts.
resultsFour interrelated themes were identified: “Caring Through Numbers: Making Quality Visible,” describing how nurses translate bedside care into indicator fields and documentation; “Carrying the Score: Performance Responsibility on Nurses’ Shoulders,” highlighting how unit-level indicator results are experienced as personal and collective judgments of nursing performance; “Working Around the System: Navigating Constraints and Contradictions,” capturing pragmatic adaptations and quiet resistance to indicator demands; and “Reclaiming Professional Voice in Quality Work,” showing how nurses use indicators as learning tools and call for shared responsibility and system support.
conclusionQuality indicators in Saudi university settings function as ruling texts that shape nurses’ priorities, accountability, and sense of professional agency. Transforming dashboards into instruments for quality improvement requires co-design with nurses, realistic targets, and organisational investment in staffing, education, and supportive digital infrastructure. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.