Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495699›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Bridging a curriculum gap: a structured model for integrating head and neck ultrasound training into undergraduate dental education.

Johannes Weimer, Alexa Lippe, Marie Brandt, Maximilian Rink, Lisa Morlock, Julian Künzel, Luisa Symeou, Liv Weimer, Christoph Sproll, Holger Buggenhagen and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Essential oral health competencies for cancer care: standardizing dental education for modern practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Johannes WeimerRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Mainz, 55131, Germany. weimer@uni-mainz.de.
Alexa LippeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Marie BrandtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Brothers of Mercy Hospital St. Elisabeth, Straubing, Germany.
Maximilian RinkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lisa MorlockDepartment of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julian KünzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Luisa SymeouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Liv WeimerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph SprollDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Holger BuggenhagenRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas PillongDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology and Head- and Neck-Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Moritz KnebelDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology and Head- and Neck-Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Marie StäuberRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Rainer MengelDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Philipps-University, Marburg, Lahn, Germany.
Oliver KripfgansDepartment of Radiology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Julia Weinmann-MenkeDepartment of Medicine I and Center for Immunotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anke HollinderbäumerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian Recker *Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bilal Al-Nawas *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUltrasonography is increasingly relevant in dental and maxillofacial diagnostics, yet structured training opportunities for dental students remain scarce. This study aimed to develop, implement, evaluate and validate a blended learning head and neck ultrasound (HNUS) curriculum for dental students, guided by the ICAP (Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive) framework and Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. MATERIAL AND

methodsFollowing Kern's six-step approach to curriculum development, a prospective quasi-experimental design was applied. Dental students (study group) completed the curriculum and were assessed at three time points (T1: pre-course; T2: Immediate post-course; T3: three-month follow-up). Physicians with prior certified ultrasound training served as a reference group at T2. The intervention combined video-based e-learning modules, lecture notes, anatomy posters, and peer-assisted hands-on training. Primary outcomes were objective knowledge (theory test at T1-T3) and practical performance (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills = DOPS at T2). Secondary outcomes included self-assessed competence, satisfaction, and attitudes toward ultrasound education (7-point Likert scale).

resultsA total of 64 students completed T1-T2, and 21 completed T3 three months after course completion. At T2, students demonstrated significant gains in theoretical knowledge compared to T1 (p < 0.001, d = - 4.1). Although a moderate decline was observed at T3, scores remained substantially above T1 (p < 0.001). In the direct comparison at T2, physicians achieved significantly higher theory test scores than students (p = 0.011). While overall DOPS performance did not differ significantly between students and physicians (p = 0.59), domain-specific variations were observed. Self-assessed competencies increased markedly from T1 to T2 (p < 0.0001), with sustained improvements observed at the three-month follow-up (T3) in the subgroup of participants who completed all assessments Evaluation of curricular components yielded consistently high ratings (mean 6.1-6.5/7), with e-learning and hands-on stations most valued. Students strongly endorsed the integration of ultrasonography into dental curricula and favoured blended learning approaches.

conclusionThis study provides initial evidence that a structured, ICAP-informed, and Kern's six-step-guided blended HNUS curriculum for dental students is feasible, effective, and well accepted. Students achieved substantial improvements in theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and self-perceived competencies, approximating physicians' performance levels overall, with some domain-specific differences. The findings support the curricular integration of ultrasonography into undergraduate dental education.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, DentalHeadNeckAdultClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleModels, EducationalProspective StudiesStudents, DentalUltrasonographyBlended learningCompetency-based trainingCurriculum developmentDental educationICAP frameworkKern’s six-step approachUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41495699
PMCPMC12849422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.