ReviewBMC nephrology2026
Diagnosis and treatment of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathies: consensus of the Genetic Diseases Committee of the Chilean Society of Nephrology.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complement Dysregulation in Kidney Diseases: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Emerging Targeted Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Complement as a driver of immune-vascular heterogeneity across preeclampsia subtypes: toward a precision medicine framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a clinical-pathological syndrome defined by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ dysfunction, commonly affecting the kidneys. The etiologies are diverse and include genetic disorders (affecting complement proteins or other pathways, such as cobalamin metabolism), infections, autoimmune diseases, malignancies, transplantation, pregnancy, and drugs. Differentiating these causes is essential, as treatment strategies and prognoses vary widely. This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians and geneticists, provides a structured approach for evaluating TMA, with particular focus on complement-mediated TMA (C-TMA). C-TMA should be considered when TMA features persist after resolution or exclusion of secondary causes. Diagnostic confirmation relies on clinical judgment, histopathology, and a favorable response to C5 complement inhibitors, such as eculizumab or ravulizumab. This therapeutic response is considered both diagnostic and prognostic. Complement gene variants (e.g., CFH, CFI, MCP/CD46, and others) and copy number variations (e.g., CFHR1-5 deletions) are found in up to 50–60% of patients, but their absence does not rule out C-TMA. Early complement inhibition may prevent irreversible organ damage and should not be delayed by pending genetic results. Genetic counseling is advised for all patients, regardless of variant status, to assess familial risk and guide long-term follow-up. A consensus aims to outline scenarios in which treatment initiation is strongly recommended, including severe or relapsing disease, chronic kidney dysfunction, among others. In Chile and Latin America, TMA remains underdiagnosed due to limited access to specialized diagnostic tools and delays in recognizing clinical subtypes. The availability of molecular testing and complement studies is restricted, often delaying targeted therapies. Treatment still relies heavily on plasma exchange, with limited access to complement inhibitors. This consensus aims to standardize care, improve early recognition, and support rational use of targeted therapies in C-TMA, particularly in regions with limited access to specialized testing or complement inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.