ArticleBMC primary care2026
Elevating an invisible role: co-designing solutions to optimize medical office assistants in primary care.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedical Office Assistants (MOAs) play a vital but often underrecognized role in primary care, managing administrative and clinically-adjacent tasks, allowing the office to run efficiently and effectively. Little is known about how to optimize these team members for the best possible patient and team outcomes. We sought to: (1) explore MOAs' current roles and experiences; (2) identify barriers and enablers to their work; and (3) co-design scalable solutions to support them in their work.
methodsThis multiprong multi-method study was guided by co-design principles and employed a combination of MOA co-creation workshops, a two-part Delphi survey, and a multi-stakeholder co-creation workshop. MOAs were recruited from a province-wide survey in Ontario, Canada. Four structured workshops with MOAs explored their experiences, challenges, and ideas for improving their work (N = 9). We conducted a thematic analysis to identify patterns in participants' experiences with MOAs. Solutions emerging from the workshops were rated through a two-round Delphi survey with MOAs, clinicians, researchers, and health system leaders (n = 32). Solutions were evaluated using the APEASE framework (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Safety, Equity). Lastly, a multi-stakeholder workshop brought 18 participants together to discuss prioritized solutions and future scaling strategies.
resultsNine MOAs participated in the co-creation workshops (all female, mean age 43, half identified as racialized). They emphasized their central role in team-based patient care, clinic flow, and health system navigation. Key challenges included a steep learning curve, lack of formal training, frequent workflow changes, emotional strain, and a perception of not being valued by patients or other team members. Staffing shortages and fragmented systems compounded these pressures. The top-rated solutions included creating a professional MOA association, expanding training and safety protocols, defining best practices for MOA roles, and streamlining referrals through centralized systems. Final discussions emphasized the need for leadership engagement, clinic and system-level buy-in, and dedicated funding to support implementation.
conclusionsThe challenges experienced by MOAs may require policy attention to better define and support their role. Targeted investments in training, professionalizing the MOA role, and embedding MOAs more meaningfully in team-based care has the potential to help primary care teams more effectively achieve the quintuple aim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.