ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Predicting the pathway involvement of metabolites annotated in the MetaCyc knowledgebase.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Quality Predicted Metabolite-Pathway Annotations Expand Pathway Coverage and Increase Enriched Pathway Detection Across Metabolomics Datasets.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicted Bacterial Metabolic Landscapes of the Sumaco Volcano: A Picrust2 Analysis of 16S rRNA Data from Amazonian Ecuador.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- High-Quality Predicted Pathway Annotations Greatly Improve Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Metabolomics Datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chemical representation standardization needed to generalize metabolic pathway involvement prediction across the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Reactome, and MetaCyc knowledgebases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe associations of metabolites with biochemical pathways are highly useful information for interpreting molecular datasets generated in biological and biomedical research. However, such pathway annotations are sparse in most molecular datasets, limiting their utility for pathway level interpretation. To address these shortcomings, several past publications have presented machine learning models for predicting the pathway association of small biomolecule (metabolite and xenobiotic) using data from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). But other similar knowledgebases exist, for example MetaCyc, which has more compound entries and pathway definitions than KEGG.
resultsAs a logical next step, we trained and evaluated multilayer perceptron models on compound entries and pathway annotations obtained from MetaCyc. From the models trained on this dataset, we observed a mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.845 with 0.0101 standard deviation, compared to a mean MCC of 0.847 with 0.0098 standard deviation for the KEGG dataset. However, KEGG's 184 metabolic-only pathway predictions (out of 502 total pathways) have a mean MCC of 0.800 with 0.021 standard deviation. Since MetaCyc pathways are metabolic focused, the MetaCyc results represent over a 5.6% improvement in metabolic pathway prediction performance.
conclusionsThese performance results are pragmatically the same, demonstrating that in aggregate, the 4055 MetaCyc pathways can be effectively predicted at the current state-of-the-art performance level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.