Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495592›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Statistical shape model-based estimation of registration error in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Behnaz Gheflati, Morteza Mirzaei, Joel Zuhars, Sunil Rottoo, Hassan Rivaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Behnaz GheflatiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. b_ghefla@encs.concordia.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4683-3374
Morteza MirzaeiThink Surgical Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joel ZuharsThink Surgical Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sunil RottooThink Surgical Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hassan RivazDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputer-assisted surgical navigation systems have been developed to improve the precision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by providing real-time guidance on implant alignment relative to patient anatomy. However, surface registration remains a key source of error that can propagate through the surgical workflow. This study investigates how patient-specific femoral bone geometry influences registration accuracy, aiming to enhance the reliability and consistency of computer-assisted orthopedic procedures.

methodsEighteen high-fidelity 3D-printed femur models were used to simulate intraoperative digitization. Surface points collected from the distal femur were registered to preoperative CT-derived models using a rigid iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Registration accuracy was quantified across six degrees of freedom. An in-house statistical shape model (SSM), built from 114 CT femurs, was employed to extract shape coefficients and correlate them with the measured registration errors. To verify robustness, additional analyses were conducted using synthetic and in silico CT-based femur datasets.

resultsSignificant correlations (p-values < 0.05) were observed between specific shape coefficients and registration errors. The third and fourth principal shape modes showed the strongest associations with rotational misalignments, particularly flexion-extension and varus-valgus components. These findings demonstrate that geometric variability in the distal femur, especially condylar morphology, plays a major role in determining the stability and accuracy of surface-based registration.

conclusionsRegistration errors in TKA are strongly influenced by patient-specific bone geometry. Shape features derived from statistical shape models can serve as reliable predictors of registration performance, providing quantitative insight into how anatomical variability impacts surgical precision and alignment accuracy in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurModels, StatisticalSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer-assisted surgeryFemurStatistical shape modelingSurface registration errorTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.