ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Race, Ethnicity, and Hemophilia: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder whose population is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. However, a comprehensive review of race, ethnicity, and hemophilia has not been published. Thus, we conducted a scoping review of race and ethnicity across the hemophilia care continuum. PubMed, Embase, and Medline were searched for articles published between 1970 and 2024 using the terms: hemophilia or haemophilia, race, racial, ethnicity, ethnic, Caucasian, Black, African American, Hispanic, and Latino. Excluded were case reports, commentaries, reviews, conference abstracts, and studies not reporting race-or-ethnicity-specific results. Of the 38 included studies, most (n = 33) were conducted in the United States (US). Nearly 80% of studies examined inhibitor development (n = 13), a major complication that can develop or outcomes (n = 17), with fewer studies on diagnosis (n = 3) or treatment (n = 5). Inhibitor risk was consistently higher in Black and Hispanic vs. White people with hemophilia. Black people with hemophilia had worse physical functioning, though findings for treatment adherence and mortality were mixed. Within specialized treatment centers, hemophilia prevalence was slightly greater in White (15.1 per 100,000) vs. Black or Hispanic men (12.4 per 100,000). Overall, this review found consistent disparities in inhibitor risk and physical outcomes in Black and Hispanic vs. White people with hemophilia. There were fewer studies and less consistent findings on hemophilia care and outcomes. Most were conducted in the US, limiting global generalizability. Future studies examining race, ethnicity, and hemophilia diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes globally are needed to inform optimal care of a growing and diverse population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.