ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Outcomes and Complications of Mobile Inferior Pedicle Breast Reduction as a Modification of Inferior Pedicle.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates a modified breast reduction technique, the mobile inferior pedicle (MIP), designed to overcome the drawbacks of the traditional inferior pedicle (IP) method, such as bottoming out, poor projection, and areolar malposition. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 70 patients were included in this retrospective review study. The key modification involved incising the inferior pedicle down to the pectoral fascia, mobilizing it superiorly, and securing it in the upper pole to enhance projection and shape.
resultsOutcomes demonstrated successful volume reduction and improved breast projection. The nipple was positioned at the breast apex in 87% of cases. The overall complication rate was 22.8%, with most issues managed outpatient. Only two cases of partial nipple necrosis were reported. Follow-up time ranged from 9 to 39 months with a mean of 23.37 months. Critically, symptoms like shoulder, neck, and back pain were significantly reduced, and patient satisfaction was high. The rate of bottoming out was observed in 12.8% of breasts.
conclusionIn conclusion, the MIP technique effectively addresses common criticisms of the IP method. By improving breast shape and projection while maintaining a manageable complication profile, it presents a strong and valuable alternative for achieving aesthetically pleasing and durable results in breast reduction surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.