ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Target Abundance in Pharmacological Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) for Small Molecules - A Proteomics Approach.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenomenon of nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK) mediated by a drug's pharmacological target, also known as target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD), has been increasingly observed in small molecules in the past decade. TMDD class effect with remarkably similar nonlinear PK behaviors has been reported in 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) inhibitors, monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, and soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) inhibitors. We anticipated that the occurrence of TMDD class effect might be due to their target capacities falling within a specific range, where nonlinear PK mediated by target binding are more likely to be evident. To test our hypothesis, we employed a mass spectrometry (MS)-based global proteomics approach to quantify the absolute protein concentrations of 11β-HSD1, sEH, and MAO-B in different tissues across species. The estimated total amounts of 11β-HSD1, MAO-B, and sEH in humans were approximately 4994, 4629, and 4137 nmol, respectively. The comparable abundance levels of these proteins suggest that TMDD is more likely to be observed when a drug binds to a target within a specific range, potentially between 1000 nmol and 10000 nmol, which corresponds to nonlinear PK at doses of 1-10 mg for a compound with a molecular weight of 400 g/mol. Our study highlights the importance of early target quantification and provides valuable insights into predicting unusual nonlinear PK caused by TMDD. Additionally, this proteomics-based approach for quantifying absolute target capacity could serve as a valuable tool for both industry and academic researchers in investigating other pharmacological targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.