Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495512›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Mapping the young EHNS network: workforce diversity, educational needs, and collaboration interests in head & neck oncology.

Carlos M Chiesa Estomba, Jeroen T Kraak, Marco Ferrari, Irene H Nauta, Leyre Gonzalez-Vallejo, Claudio Sampieri, Pawel Golusinski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos M Chiesa EstombaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain. chiesaestomba86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-9464
Jeroen T KraakDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco FerrariSection of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova. Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, Padova, Italy.
Irene H NautaDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leyre Gonzalez-VallejoDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
Claudio SampieriDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Pawel GolusinskiDepartment of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

porpuseThe Young European Head and Neck Society (Young EHNS) supports early-career professionals in head and neck (H&N) oncology, yet the composition and educational preferences of this network have not been systematically described.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 402 Young EHNS members assessed geographic distribution, subspecialty affiliation, and self-reported interest in nine educational domains using a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsRespondents originated predominantly from Spain (26.5%), Portugal (9.2%), Italy (8.8%), and the United Kingdom (7.2%). Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery represented 59.3% of respondents, followed by Medical Oncology (14.1%) and Maxillofacial Surgery (11.4%). The highest-rated educational interests were research collaboration (mean 4.68/5), international case discussions (4.61), and virtual multidisciplinary tumor boards (4.57). Industry-sponsored content received the lowest rating (3.12).

conclusionThis perception-based survey reveals a geographically diverse, surgically anchored but multidisciplinary early-career network with strong preference for interactive, collaborative learning formats. These findings may inform future EHNS educational programming and cross-border collaboration initiatives.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMedical OncologyOtolaryngologySocieties, MedicalCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforce DiversityEHNSEuropeHead and neck oncologyMedical educationMultidisciplinary collaborationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID41495512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.