Observational studyCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2026
The effect of paclitaxel premedication discontinuation on rescue medication use.
Observational study in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePremedication with clemastine and dexamethasone is administered to prevent paclitaxel-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which predominantly occur during the first two administrations. To reduce premedication and related adverse effects, our hospital implemented a policy to discontinue premedication after two paclitaxel doses if no HSR occurred. This study evaluated whether rescue medication use after the second dose was not substantially higher following the protocol change.
methodWe conducted a retrospective, observational, non-inferiority study, comparing patients receiving premedication for every paclitaxel administration (pre-policy change) with those discontinuing premedication after two HSR-free administrations (post-policy change). The primary outcome was the incidence of rescue medication use; non-inferiority was defined as the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) boundary below 4.0%.
resultsA total of 148 patients were included (74 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Rescue medication was required in 3/74 patients (4.1%; 95% CI: 0.8-11.4%) in the pre-policy change group and 8/74 (10.8%; 95% CI: 4.8-20.2%) in the post-policy change group, yielding a difference of 6.8% (95% CI: - 1.6-15.1%). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated, due to insufficient power resulting from an underestimated baseline incidence of rescue medication use. This limitation precludes interpreting the findings as evidence of inferiority.
conclusionDiscontinuing premedication after two paclitaxel doses increased the incidence of rescue medication use, although reactions were mild and manageable, with most patients completing treatment. These findings suggest that premedication may not be necessary for all patients. Further research is needed to assess the safety of discontinuing premedication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.