ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
GOFlowLLM-curating miRNA literature with large language models and flowcharts.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network Analysis to Identify MicroRNAs Involved in Alzheimer's Disease and to Improve Drug Prioritization.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Empowering biological knowledgebases: advances in human-in-the-loop AI-driven literature curation.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe exponential growth of non-coding RNA research-with over 230 000 papers published since 2000-has created an urgent knowledge management crisis in molecular biology. Despite their crucial regulatory roles, microRNAs (miRNAs) face a significant curation bottleneck, with only 1400 articles manually curated to the Gene Ontology (GO) knowledgebase over a decade. This highlights the critical need for automated systems that can accelerate biocuration while maintaining high-quality standards.
resultsWe present GOFlowLLM, an automated curation pipeline powered by reasoning-enabled Large Language Models (LLMs) that follows established GO curation flowcharts to extract and structure miRNA-mediated gene silencing data at scale. When evaluated on existing curation, GOFlowLLM selects the correct GO term in 90% of cases, with curators agreeing with 95% of the system's reasoning steps and 90% of the evidence selected. Applied to 6996 previously uncurated articles using the Qwen QwQ-32B model, our system identified 2538 new candidate GO annotations on 1785 articles in just 58 hours-potentially doubling the available miRNA GO curation. Manual review shows curators agreed with the selected term in 87% of cases, the model's reasoning in 92% of cases, and the extracted evidence in 93%. The integration of reasoning traces provides transparent justification for annotations that can be reviewed by human curators, addressing a key challenge in adopting AI for scientific curation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GOFlowLLM is implemented as an automated pipeline that follows expert-designed reasoning frameworks to maintain curation quality. The system is available on GitHub: https://github.com/RNAcentral/GO_Flow_LLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.