Observational studyScientific reports2026
Utility of the Swedish Anticholinergic Burden Scale in a memory clinic setting: a comparison with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03208569 (Treatment Optimization Regarding Anticholinergic Medications Potential Impact on Cognitive Test Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment Optimization Regarding Anticholinergic Medications Potential Impact on Cognitive Test Performance
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticholinergic Burden in Individuals with Down Syndrome: An Examination of Risk and Clinical Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Anticholinergic Burden in Elderly People in Nursing Homes: Cross-Sectional Assessment Using ACB Calculator and CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticholinergic burden is associated with cognitive impairment, especially in older individuals with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. The objective of the study was to explore the use of drugs displaying anticholinergic properties and examine the utility of the newly developed Swedish Anticholinergic Burden Scale (Swe-ABS) in a memory clinic setting. A descriptive cross-sectional study, involving individuals ≥ 50 years of age attending a memory clinic in southern Sweden between September 2017 and September 2021. In total, 657 individuals, mean age 72.4 ± 9.0 years, 375 (57.1%) males, were included. The study population used 4805 medications at an average of 7.3 ± 4.3 per individual. A total of 448 (68.2%) participants used drugs with any anticholinergic effects identified with the Swe-ABS of whom 179 (27.2%) had a high anticholinergic burden (i.e., Swe-ABS ≥ 3). The corresponding figures for the established Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale were 314 (47.8%) and 97 (14.8%) respectively. The mean Swe-ABS score was significantly higher than the mean ACB score (1.7 and 1.0; p < 0.05). Individuals < 75 years had a significant higher Swe-ABS score and ACB score than individuals ≥ 75 years (Swe-ABS: < 75 years: 1.94 ± 2.20 and ≥ 75 years: 1.50 ± 1.54; p < 0.05; ACB: < 75 years: 1.13 ± 1.57 and ≥ 75 years: 0.80 ± 1.14 p < 0.05). Within the study population, a total of 64 drugs not listed in the Swe-ABS were identified. This study highlights the prevalence of drugs with anticholinergic effects among individuals presumably vulnerable to muscarinic antagonism. The Swe-ABS, a risk scale for ascertaining the anticholinergic burden, seems to effectively identify a substantial proportion of drugs commonly used on the Swedish market. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT03208569, Registration date: 27 June 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.