ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinical evaluation and comparative study of a fully automated erythrocyte osmotic fragility analysis system based on scatter turbidimetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) is essential for diagnosing hemolytic disorders, yet traditional methods are labor-intensive and time-consuming, limiting their clinical efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a fully automated EOF analysis system developed by Shenzhen Pumen Technology Co., Ltd., which utilizes scatter turbidimetry, and to determine its accuracy and consistency compared with the conventional spectrophotometric method. A total of 114 whole blood samples were analyzed using the automated system with reagents from Changchun Huili Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and results were compared with those obtained from the Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer as the reference method. Consistency between the two systems was assessed using linear regression, Kappa statistics, Bland-Altman analysis, and medical decision level bias evaluation. The automated EOF system demonstrated a strong linear correlation with the reference method, achieving a Kappa value of 1.00, indicating complete agreement in classification results. Moreover, 99.11% of data points fell within acceptable ranges, and bias confidence intervals at the medical decision level were below threshold values. These findings indicate that the fully automated EOF system provides stable and reliable results that align with clinical needs and offer high consistency with traditional methods, supporting its potential for broader clinical application and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.