ArticleScientific reports2026
Advancing censored geochemical Au prediction through Bayesian spatial models and Random Forest with fractal-based background separation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Censored geochemical data, particularly below detection limits, challenge mineral exploration by biasing anomaly delineation and spatial patterns. This study presents a multi-stage framework combining Bayesian Gaussian Random Field (BGRF) modeling with Random Forest (RF) learning, enhanced by fractal-based background separation, to accurately predict censored Au concentrations. 14 samples with gold concentrations below 5 ppb were hypothesized as censored data to enable a more accurate evaluation of the model's performance based on their real Au concentrations. Unlike constant substitution methods, the framework preserves censored information and reconstructs spatial variability through probabilistic inference and nonlinear learning. The BGRF model incorporates spatial coordinates and Cu as the principal covariate to capture spatial autocorrelation and inter-element associations, producing probabilistic estimates for hypothesized censored data (HCD) that are then used to train the RF under a 5-fold out-of-fold scheme. The HCD estimated by spatial BGRF covariate model were performed as inputs for RF prediction model. A targeted calibration and scaling procedure reduces detection-limit bias and improves low-range predictions. Comparative analyses show that the calibrated and scaled RF-BGRF model substantially enhances accuracy and preserves realistic geochemical structures, outperforming half the detection limit (LD-half) or the detection limit divided by the square root of two (LD-rad2) approaches. This framework offers a promising tool for refining left-censored geochemical data in complex geological environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.