Observational studyScientific reports2026
Changes in interictal cerebral blood flow observed in migraine patients who respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide therapy.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed interictal arterial spin labeling (ASL) in 73 migraine patients, including those who underwent antibody switching, before and after anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) therapy, classified cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes after treatment, compared clinical features, and identified predictors of treatment response. As a result, CBF in patients with cortical hyperperfusion (CHP) before treatment and decreased CBF after treatment (27 patients) or with no CHP before treatment and increased CBF after treatment (18 patients) became more normal. Notably, the latter group showed the highest percentage of patients with a > 50% decrease in monthly headache days (94%). Approximately 90% of patients with no CHP before treatment and decreased CBF after treatment (19 patients) showed inappropriate changes in CBF after treatment, with CBF decreasing below normal levels. Only one patient among those with no change in CBF before or after treatment regardless of pretreatment CHP (9 patients) responded to treatment. Multivariable analysis revealed CHP findings despite presentation with insomnia and insomnia with white matter hyperintensities as significant negative neuroradiological predictors of > 50% response. Interictal CBF measurements from ASL before and after anti-CGRP therapy may be clinically useful for predicting treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.