ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Translational Strategies for Developing and Evaluating Transcatheter Devices in Swine Heart Failure Models.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing a therapeutic transcatheter device for cardiovascular diseases requires precise preclinical large animal models and robust evaluation methods. Three key aspects are essential for evaluating the safety and efficacy of a device: (1) types of swine heart failure models, (2) appropriate echocardiographic methods, and (3) the specific implantation approaches in swine. Common heart failure models include rapid pacing heart failure models, volume overload models, and ischemic models. Among the ischemic models, several approaches are performed to replicate the pathological conditions, such as coronary artery ligation, ameroid constrictor implantation, balloon occlusion, and coronary embolization. The optimal choice of echocardiographic method varies based on the procedure and includes transthoracic, transesophageal, intracardiac, and epicardial techniques. Echocardiographic imaging serves as an invaluable tool in both preclinical and clinical settings, providing structural and functional assessments, procedural guidance during device placement, and comprehensive evaluations of cardiac function and structural changes before and after implantation. Implantation approaches, such as trans-atrial, trans-apical, trans-septal, and trans-right pulmonary methods, each offer unique advantages and challenges. A thorough understanding of these approaches, including the orientation of the catheter tip relative to critical anatomical structures like the mitral annulus or coronary vasculature, is essential for ensuring procedural success. This review explores these aspects to contribute to the development and refinement of catheter-based cardiovascular interventions, ensuring reliability in preclinical data and successful clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.