ArticleScientific reports2026
An intelligent life prediction approach employing machine learning models for the power transformers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of transformer insulating paper is vital for reliable operation and optimal transformer management, with the Degree of Polymerization (DP) serving as a primary indicator of insulation health. Direct DP measurement is often impractical, prompting this study to explore machine learning models for predicting DP using 2-Furfuraldehyde (2-FAL), a cellulose degradation byproduct measurable in transformer oil. This approach classifies insulation into four categories—Fresh (DP: 700–1200), Lightly Aged (DP: 450–700), Moderately Aged (DP: 250–450), and Worstly Aged (DP < 250)—based on DP values, offering a streamlined alternative to conventional multi-gas diagnostic methods. Supervised machine learning algorithms were developed using IEEE C57.104-2019 standard data, employing regression (Linear Regression, Polynomial Regression, Random Forest Regressor) to predict continuous DP and classification (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel, Random Forest Classifier) to categorize insulation condition. Model performance was evaluated using regression metrics (Mean Squared Error, Mean Absolute Error, R² Score) and classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score). The Random Forest Regressor (R²: 0.894) and Classifier (accuracy: 0.925) demonstrated superior performance, enabling precise, non-invasive DP estimation and condition assessment. These findings highlight the efficacy of 2-FAL-based machine learning models for transformer health monitoring, facilitating predictive maintenance and enhancing operational reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.