Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495299›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Normal spino-pelvic alignment in healthy adolescents: defining the PI-SS relationship and laying the foundations for pre-operative sagittal planning.

Matteo Traversari, Alberto Ruffilli, Giovanni Viroli, Marco Manzetti, Alessandro Cargeli, Chiara Ricci Petitoni, Marco Ialuna, Gino Rocca, Cesare Faldini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matteo TraversariClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto RuffilliClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. alberto.ruffilli2@unibo.it.
Giovanni ViroliClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco ManzettiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro CargeliClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara Ricci PetitoniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco IalunaClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Gino RoccaOrtopedia e Traumatologia Pediatrica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Cesare FaldiniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 1, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical treatment of adolescent spinal deformities requires accurate pre-operative planning. Few studies confirmed that sagittal alignment restoration is crucial to reduce the risk of early degeneration, yet sagittal alignment targets are lacking in adolescents. No predictive formula for ideal sacral slope (SS

methodsFull-spine standing biplanar X-rays were analyzed. PI, SS and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured. Three regression models (linear, polynomial, and logarithmic) were generated to describe the PI-SS relationship. The adult-derived model by Yilgor et al. was also applied to the study cohort. Accuracy and precision of all models were assessed globally and within PI-based subgroups. External validation was performed using a previously published dataset.

resultsA total of 122 patients (mean age 14 years) were included. Logarithmic and polynomial models achieved the best fit within the study cohort (R² = 0.63 and 0.63). The Yilgor et al. model showed substantially lower fit (R² = 0.39) and systematic underestimation of SS in intermediate and high PI subgroups. The linear model performed best within the external validation cohort showing the best goodness-of-fit, accuracy, precision, and robustness. The Yilgor model again showed systematic SS underestimation and higher errors.

conclusionOur results suggest that the formula SS

Indexed as

PelvisSacrumSpineAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePreoperative CareRadiographyAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisAdolescent spinal deformitiesDevelopmental spondylolisthesis.GAP scoreHealthy patientsNormal spino-pelvic alignmentPelvic incidencePelvic versionPre-operative planningSacral slopeScheuermann kyphosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.