ArticleCommunications biology2026
Altering chemotaxis as a strategy to enhance the foraging range of motility-restricted bacteria.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemotaxis is an adaptive mechanism that shapes the behavior of motile bacteria in habitats characterized by fluctuating and often conflicting cues environmental (e.g. stay-or-go). Chemotactic responses are orchestrated by phosphorylation of CheY, which triggers rotational switching of the flagella. In Escherichia coli and similar taxa, CheZ is the principal CheY-P phosphatase, whereas in lineages lacking CheZ, members of the structurally distinct CheC-FliY-CheX family fulfill this role. Intriguingly, some bacteria code for CheX and CheZ, presenting a conundrum regarding their function, and the role of CheX in CheZ-containing organisms is unknown. We imposed a sustained motility constraint under conditions of looming nutrient depletion in Vibrio vulnificus, which possesses both CheX and CheZ, using the c-di-GMP effector PlzD that robustly curtails swimming motility. Our analyses revealed that the activity of CheX, but not CheZ, could be attenuated to mitigate the imposed constraint, assigning CheX a pivotal function in fine-tuning foraging behavior during a "stay-or-go" decision. V. vulnificus CheX maintained CheY-P phosphatase activity despite its conserved dimeric fold structure exhibiting divergence in active-site architecture, suggesting a preserved catalytic mechanism among distantly related homologs. Co-conservation of cheX and cheZ across disparate bacterial phyla suggests their adaptative retention confers robustness and versatility to chemotactic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.