ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Discovery of predictive biomarkers for cancer therapy through computational approaches.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Ensuring multiomics data reproducibility for artificial intelligence with reference materials as a common calibrator.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Interpreting the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning and Systems Pharmacology in Small-Molecule Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Synthetic lethality in cancer: mechanism exploration and therapeutic applications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response and resistance in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Delineation of molecular subtypes based on pathway activation signatures reveals intrinsic tumor heterogeneity and pan-cancer shared features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Toll-like receptors in innate immunity and inflammation: from fundamental biology to clinic insights.Immunity & inflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision oncology involves the use of predictive biomarkers to personalize treatment. However, for most cancer therapeutics or combination regimens, effective biomarkers have been elusive. This challenge has fuelled efforts to interrogate increasingly diverse and complex clinical and molecular determinants of treatment response. Some molecular predictors have been identified (for example, based on analysis of transcriptomic or imaging data), although the limited reproducibility and robustness of many of these candidate biomarkers make them difficult to apply in clinical practice. Moreover, different types of predictor must often be combined to optimize treatment selection (for example, gene signatures plus patient characteristics). Computational methods, including machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches, provide opportunities to identify predictive patterns in both clinical data and preclinical datasets and to predict treatment response for individual patients. Such approaches also offer opportunities to predict the efficacy or synergy of drug combinations, for example, via extrapolation from correlations of monotherapy responses or by linking the cellular responses observed in preclinical drug screens with molecular and clinical data from patients. In this Review, we describe the application of computational methods to predictive biomarker discovery, including current progress, key challenges facing this field, and future opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.