ArticleScientific reports2026
Navigating population-level coancestry in forensic mixture analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic similarity of unrelated individuals of the same population can be measured through the coancestry coefficient, which quantifies the probability of a pair of alleles randomly chosen having a common ancestor. It is thus expected that the higher this coefficient, the lower the genetic variation between individuals of a population. This may weaken the evidence's weight in forensic genetics settings, whenever a person of interest cannot be excluded as a contributor to the evidence. Under simple assumptions, the impact of disregarding coancestry when quantifying the likelihood of an individual having contributed to a mixture evidence sample can be evaluated through an algebraic approach. This methodology becomes, however, unfeasible when considering all the information currently obtained from samples in forensic cases, whose analyses are software-dependent. Innovatively, this work assessed the impact of disregarding coancestry when quantifying the weight of the evidence in a modern population under the scope of identification problems involving mixtures. Methodology relied on both an algebraic approach (for simulated data) and an informatics one (for more complex real casework data). The results reinforce the importance of considering the proper population coancestry, whose impact is expected to be even higher for more isolated, substructured, or smaller populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.