ArticleScientific reports2026
Forecasting photovoltaic power in high-latitude regions via support vector machine optimized by meta-heuristics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing drought forecasting with CNN-TQWT and metaheuristic hybrids: evidence from Norway.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine-learning techniques are widely used across many disciplines, including electricity generation forecasting. In this study, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) based models, one of the machine learning techniques, were developed for daily PV power forecasting. To improve model performance, models were tuned with four metaheuristic optimizers, including the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Daily PV power and temperature data from 2020 to 2023 were obtained for the Stavanger, Oslo, and Kristiansand regions which located in southern Norway. One of the innovative aspects of this study is the investigation of the performance of SVM (Support Vector Machine) combined with various optimization methods across four alternative input configurations. To examine the different feature combinations, four different input configurations were created through the Minimum-Redundancy Maximum-Relevancy (MRMR) method. The analysis results obtained with SVM were further enhanced using all optimization techniques. Among those, the SVM-PSO-M04 (r = 0.7707, NSE = 0.5748, KGE = 0.7092, PI = 0.2964 and RMSE = 0.6513) method produced the most effective results (improving the correlation coefficient (r) to 0.7707 (approximately a 19% increase over the untuned SVM)) among the tested hybrid configurations obtained in our experiments. Moreover, coupling temperature data alongside PV power as model input also tends to improve forecasting skill. Results of this study provide a case-study benchmark for researchers, institutions, and other stakeholders engaged in renewable energy planning and management in high-latitude regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.