Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495212›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A directed weighted network approach for hazard chain risk assessment including heavy rainfall induced geological disasters and flooding.

Jingjing Pei, Caiyan Dai, Tong Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingjing PeiSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Caiyan DaiSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China. daicaiyan@email.cugb.edu.cn.
Tong CuiHuirui Energy Holdings Group Co., Ltd., Ordos, 017000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing frequency of extreme climatic events in cities, the heavy rainfall-geological hazard-flood urban hazard chain has become more prominent, while traditional single-hazard assessments fail to reveal its systemic transmission mechanisms. This study constructs a hazard chain risk assessment framework based on directed weighted networks to support precise urban disaster identification and control. Using Event Tree Analysis (ETA), 23 key hazard nodes were identified to build a causal loop network, and a Bayesian network was developed to quantify node dependencies. The disaster-bearing body was divided into actual and functional subsystems, and its exposure-vulnerability and disaster resistance capacity were evaluated using an improved Analytic Hierarchy Process and the brittle entropy method. A multi-influence matrix integrating node degree, shortest path, and global influence was designed to calculate the risk weights of 38 nodes and establish the directed weighted network. Applied to Mentougou District, Beijing, the comprehensive hazard chain risk value was calculated as 34.23, and key high-risk nodes were identified. The results show that this model surpasses traditional unweighted or single-hazard methods by enabling dynamic and quantitative evaluation of complex urban hazard chains, offering new insights for enhancing urban resilience and disaster prevention.

Indexed as

Bayesian networksDirected weighted networksExposure-vulnerability analysisHazard chain risk assessmentUrban hazard chains

Identifiers

PMID41495212
PMCPMC12827933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.